data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43c96/43c96015b78ebacfb14c3b57409aade6b210e63c" alt="Are 3 domain controllers overkill in company of 100"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9b99f/9b99f9fdbefec6f02af8d10c5516f49cc051a2d4" alt="are 3 domain controllers overkill in company of 100 are 3 domain controllers overkill in company of 100"
The "primary" DC (it has FMS roles etc.) on it is running Server 2008R2. The 2 "secondary" DC's are running Server 2016. All sites are tied together with private circuits. They also have an exchange server on premise running Exchange 2016 on server 2016 (bare metal). I'm only saying this to eliminate a bunch of chaff responses of variations of make sure you got licensing)Įach DC is at a different location.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c55e/7c55ef6cea9283fb4609d2e8e17d1097253727d2" alt="are 3 domain controllers overkill in company of 100 are 3 domain controllers overkill in company of 100"
(they are a medical facility and thus under charity pricing and if any of you have not had experience with that let's just say pricing is disgustingly cheap next to free basically. They also have a Microsoft volume license account so licensing is not an issue here. I have a customer with multiple sites, and 3 domain controllers. Just wanted to get people's opinions on the following:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43c96/43c96015b78ebacfb14c3b57409aade6b210e63c" alt="Are 3 domain controllers overkill in company of 100"